This article discusses the usefulness of international courts, and particularly the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in settling disputes involving the use of force. The author begins by: (1) noting possible distinctions between use-of-force disputes and other types of disputes; (2) discussing past decisions of the ICJ and other judicial bodies involving such disputes; (3) analyzing the role of judicial organs in use-of-force case as contemplated by the U.N. Charter; and (4) considering possible legal barriers to the adjudication of use-of- force disputes. The author concludes that there are not, in fact, any inherent legal barriers to the ICJ's adjudication of such disputes. Based on this conclusion, the author then suggests: (1) the types of situations where adjudication of such use-of-force disputes is likely to be most promising; (2) the possible advantages and disadvantages of adjudication in use-of-force situations; (3) the circumstances where adjudication in use-of-force situations is likely to occur; (4) measures which might enhance the ICJ's ability to resolve such disputes; and (5) the possible future of the court's role in resolving use-of-force disputes.
